Friday, 3 July 2015

In Sudan: 12 Christian girls leaving church service arrested, forced to strip for wearing skirts and trousers.

South Sudanese Christians living in the North gather to attend Christmas day celebrations at a Catholic church in the Umbada locality of Omdurman, December 25, 2013.
Twelve young Christian women in Khartoum were arrested by Sudanese authorities, forced to strip out of their clothes after they left a church service wearing what was deemed "immoral" by the police
A Christian persecution watchdog organization, Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), reported that the 12 women were were leaving a service at the El Izba Baptist Church inKhartoum last Thursday wearing trousers and skirts when they were detained by the local public order police.
According to Christian Post, the women were taken to the police station and forced to remove their clothing to allow the police officers to inspect the clothing to verify the clothing's indecency.
Faith McDonnell, director of religious liberty programs and of the Church Alliance for a New Sudan at the Washington D.C.-based Institute on Religion & Democracy, told The Christian Post on Thursday that Sudan's constitution states that the immoral dress law does not apply to Christians, since they are not expected to follow Shariah law.
Displaced Sudanese girl Hawa Sliman Idriss, 13, who was raped last Friday by unidentified armed men, sits at her shelter at Otash Internally Displaced Persons Camp in Nyala, southern Darfur, March 18, 2009.play
Displaced Sudanese girl Hawa Sliman Idriss, 13, who was raped last Friday by unidentified armed men, sits at her shelter at Otash Internally Displaced Persons Camp in Nyala, southern Darfur, March 18, 2009.
 (Reuters)

"But as Christians, they are supposed to, under the constitution, have a right to dress the way they want and not according to Shariah," McDonnell said. "Sharia is not supposed to apply to the Christians, but more and more it is being used against them. Some were wearing skirts, so I don't know what they consider immoral."
"In fact, the attorneys who represented them said that there is a broad scope to define what constitutes indecent or immoral dress, and basically it is whatever Khartoum wants it to be at the moment," she added.
McDonnell told CP that she finds it "hypocritical" for authorities to force the women to strip after they were arrested for "indecent clothing."
"They were arrested by the public order police because they were wearing indecent clothing. When they got to the police headquarters, they had to take off the clothing," MCDonnell stated. "So they basically made them strip so that they could check and see if the clothes were actually immoral or not. So, that is quite a hypocritical stance."
Two of the girls were reportedly freed and not charged with any crime, while 10 others were charged with violating the dress code under Article 152 of the Sudanese Criminal Code. The females were released on bail and now are awaiting their hearings.
According to reports, it's believed that at least three of the girls are younger than 18, but were still charged as adults.
"We are deeply concerned by the unwarranted arrest of these 12 young women and are alarmed by reports that three of them may be minors who have been arrested arbitrarily and charged as adults in violation of their rights under Articles 37 and 40 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which Sudan is a party," CSW Chief Executive Mervyn Thomas said in a statement.
"Furthermore, forcing these young women to undress amounts to degrading treatment, as defined by Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Sudan is also a party."
Lawyers for the women claim that the charges against them prove that the immoral dress law is only arbitrarily applied and added that the law is also very broad and not well defined.
"Two of the women were released. Who decided that their dress was no longer immoral if when they were arrested their dress was considered indecent?" One of the lawyers told CSW. "The law needs to be clarified."

No comments: